-7(-2 ( 3x+1)+ 4) +9​

Answer:

0.5555 = 55.55% probability that Max will get the job.

Step-by-step explanation:

What is the probability that Max will get the job?

The sum of all probabilities is 100% = 1, so, considering Max's probability as x:

[tex]x + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} = 1[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9x + 3 + 1}{9} = 1[/tex]

[tex]9x + 4 = 9[/tex]

[tex]9x = 5[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{5}{9}[/tex]

[tex]x = 0.5555[/tex]

0.5555 = 55.55% probability that Max will get the job.

The max has probability of getting this job is x= 0.5555 and 55.55%

Suppose that ;

Max has probability of getting this job is = x

and other two companies have probability to get job is [tex]\frac{1}{3} or \frac{1}{9}[/tex].

Sum of the probability have bid a job is 100% which is equal to 1.

According to given question ;

Sum of all the companies having probability to get the job = 1

[tex]x + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} = 1[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9.x+1.3+1.1}{9} = 1\\9x+3+1 = 9.1\\9x+4 =9\\9x = 9-4\\9x = 5\\x = \frac{5}{9}[/tex]

x = 0.5555

The Max has probability of getting this job is x= 0.5555 or 55.55%

For the more information about probability click the link given below

https://brainly.com/question/14210034

Answer:

ratio of water and milk=2:3

i.e. water=2

milk=3

now adding 1 liter of water in 2

2+1=3

and 1 liter of milk in 3

3+1=4

hence,

the new ratio is 3:4

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope this will help

plz mark as brainliest

Answer:

hhhhjhgbbbjjhjjjjjkkkkkkkk

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Q1. Sobey's is the best deal

In Food Basics, having the two loaves of bread costing 4.88 would mean that (4.88 / 2) one would cost 2.44.

To find out how much three would cost, multiply 2.44 by three, and the result is 7.32, which is higher than the three loves of bread that costs 7.20 in Sobey's, which Sobey's has a better deal. 7.20 / 3 = 2.40, yet Food Basics does cost higher by 4 cents for just one.

I am not too sure about question 2, but I do hope the above question helps!

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

the square root of 8 is 2 and the square root of 18 is 4.5 and both simplified is 4/9.

Aslo did this last week.

Answer:

0.9319 = 93.19% probability that at least 88 out of 153 registered voters will vote in the presidential election.

Step-by-step explanation:

Binomial probability distribution

Probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, with p probability.

Can be approximated to a normal distribution, using the expected value and the standard deviation.

The expected value of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]E(X) = np[/tex]

The standard deviation of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]\sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)}[/tex]

Normal probability distribution

Problems of normally distributed distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

When we are approximating a binomial distribution to a normal one, we have that [tex]\mu = E(X)[/tex], [tex]\sigma = \sqrt{V(X)}[/tex].

153 voters:

This means that [tex]n = 153[/tex]

Assume the probability that a given registered voter will vote in the presidential election is 63%.

This means that [tex]p = 0.63[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = E(X) = np = 153(0.63) = 96.39[/tex]

[tex]\sigma = \sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)} = \sqrt{153*0.63*0.37} = 5.97[/tex]

Consider the probability that at least 88 out of 153 registered voters will vote in the presidential election.

Using continuity correction, this is: [tex]P(X \geq 88 - 0.5) = P(X \geq 87.5)[/tex], which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 87.5.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{87.5 - 96.39}{5.97}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.49[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.49[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0681.

1 - 0.0681 = 0.9319

0.9319 = 93.19% probability that at least 88 out of 153 registered voters will vote in the presidential election.

Step-by-step explanation:

Which correlation coefficient indicates the data set with the strongest linear correlation?

0.66

The correlation coefficient indicates the data set with the strongest linear correlation is -0.83

"It measures the strength of the relationship between two relative variables."

"When the rate of change is constant between two variables then it is said to be linear correlation."

For given example,

We have been given correlation coefficients.

We need to find the correlation coefficient that indicates the data set with the strongest linear correlation.

We know, the correlation coefficient lies between -1 to 1.

So, the strongest linear correlation is indicated by a correlation coefficient of -1 or 1.

From given correlation coefficients,

-0.83 is close to -1.

Therefore, the correlation coefficient indicates the data set with the strongest linear correlation is -0.83

Learn more about linear correlation coefficient here:

https://brainly.com/question/12400903

#SPJ2

Answer:

Graph C.

*See attachment below

Step-by-step explanation:

A graph that shows a set of ordered pairs representing a function would have each x-value being plotted against only one y-value. That is, every x-value must have exactly one y-value. Every x-value must not have more than 1 y-value being plotted against it.

The graph that shows this is the graph in option as shown in the attachment below.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  b = 71 m

  A = 83°

  C = 29°

Step-by-step explanation:

Many calculators can solve triangles. Apps are available for phone and tablet, or on the internet, like the one used here. In general, it takes less time to use one of these than to type your question into Brainly.

Given two sides and the angle between them, the Law of Cosines is the appropriate relation to use for finding the third side.

  b = √(a² +c² -2ac·cos(B))

  b = √(76² +37² -2·76·37·cos(67.75°)) ≈ √5015.48

  b ≈ 70.82005 ≈ 71 . . . meters

__

One a side and its opposite angle are known, the remaining angles are found using the Law of Sines.

  sin(A)/a = sin(B)/b

  A = arcsin(a·sin(B)/b) = arcsin(76·sin(67.75°)/70.82005) ≈ 83.33°

  A ≈ 83°

  C = arcsin(37·sin(67.75°)/70.82005) ≈ 28.92°

  C ≈ 29°

Or, you can find the remaining angle from 180° -68° -83°  = 29°.

Answer:

what is the question man

Answer:

a) To show that we can use the 1 proportion z-interval, we know that 250 ( size sample) is big enough to approximate the binomial distribution ( tolerance-intolerance) to a normal distribution.

b) See step by step explanation

CI 90 %  =  (  0,296 ; 0,392)

c) We can support that with 90 % of confidence we will find the random variable between this interval ( 0,296 ; 0,392)

d) the CI 95 % will be wider

Step-by-step explanation:

Sample Information:

Sample size n  =  250

number of people with milk intolerance  x = 86

p₁  =  86 / 250    p₁ = 0.344    and   q₁ =  1  - p₁   q₁ = 0,656

To calculate 90 % of Confidence Interval   α = 10%  α/2 = 5 %  

α/2 = 0,05     z(c) from z-table is:  z(c) =  1.6

Then:

CI 90 %  =  (  p₁  ±  z(c) * SE )

SE =  √ (p₁*q₁)/n   =  √ 0,225664/250

SE = 0,03

CI 90 %  =  (  0,344  ±  1,6* 0,03 )

CI 90 %  =  (  0,344 - 0,048 ;  0,344 + 0,048)

b) CI 90 %  =  (  0,296 ; 0,392)

a) To show that we can use the 1 proportion z-interval, we know that 250 ( size sample) is big enough to approximate the binomial distribution ( tolerance-intolerance) to a normal distribution.

c) We can support that with 90 % of confidence we will find the random variable between  this interval (  0,296 ; 0,392) .

d) CI 95 %      then significance level α = 5 %   α/2 = 2.5 %  

α/2  =  0,025      z(c) = 1.96   from z-table

SE = 0,03

And  as 1.96 > 1.6    the CI 95 % will be wider

CI 95% =  ( 0,344 ±  1.96*0,03 )

CI 95% =  (  0,344 ± 0,0588 )

CI 95% =  ( 0,2852 ; 0,4028 )

Answer:

Hence we do not have enough evidence to conclude that a liquid diet caused more weight loss.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here the answer is given as follows,

Answer:

Distance = 7 7/9 Km

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following data;

Distance = 2⅔ = 8/3 Km

Time = ⅗ hour

First of all, we would find her speed;

Speed = distance/time

Speed = (8/3)/(3/5)

Speed = 8/3 * 5/3

Speed = 40/9 km/h

Next, we would find the distance covered when time = 1¾ hours

Distance = speed * time

Distance = 40/9 * 1¾

Distance = 40/9 * 7/4

Distance = 10/9 * 7

Distance = 70/9

Distance = 7 7/9 Km

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 6 by 2:

3(1+2)

Add 1 and 2:

3 x 3

Multiply 3 by 3:

3 x 3 = 9

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

6

------

2(1+2)

6

-----

2(3)

6

-----

6

1

Let x and y be the required amounts of the 35% and 60% acid solutions, respectively.

x liters of 35% acid solution contains 0.35x L of acid.

y liters of 80% acid solution contains 0.80y L of acid.

Together, a combined (x + y) L of mixed solutions contains (0.35x + 0.80y) L of acid.

You want to end up with 60 L of 65% acid solution, which means

x + y = 60

0.35x + 0.80y = 0.65 × 60 = 39

Solve for x and y :

y = 60 - x

0.35x + 0.80 (60 - x) = 39

0.35x + 48 - 0.80x = 39

0.45x = 9

x = 20

y = 40

Answer:

= 6 ways = Required number of ways = (120×6)=720

Answer:

182/3,3 8/3, 152/3

Step-by-step explanation:

a+b+c=124

a trừ c=  10

4b=c

Answer:

a=29,b=79,c=19

Step-by-step explanation:

a=c+10

b=4c

=> a+b+c=c+10+4c+c=124

=> c=19

=> a= 29, b=79

Answer:

a) The 99% CI for the true proportion of voters who prefer the Republican candidate is (0.3658, 0.6001). This means that we are 99% sure that the true population proportion of all voters who prefer the Republican candidate is (0.3658, 0.6001).

b) The upper bound of the confidence interval is above 0.5 = 50%, which meas that the candidate can be confidence of victory.

Step-by-step explanation:

Question a:

In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of [tex]\pi[/tex], and a confidence level of [tex]1-\alpha[/tex], we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

[tex]\pi \pm z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}[/tex]

In which

z is the z-score that has a p-value of [tex]1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}[/tex].

Sample of 120 registered voters in order to predict the winner of a local election. The Democrat candidate was favored by 62 of the respondents.

So 120 - 62 = 58 favored the Republican candidate, so:

[tex]n = 120, \pi = \frac{58}{120} = 0.4833[/tex]

99% confidence level

So [tex]\alpha = 0.01[/tex], z is the value of Z that has a p-value of [tex]1 - \frac{0.01}{2} = 0.995[/tex], so [tex]Z = 2.575[/tex].  

The lower limit of this interval is:

[tex]\pi - z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}} = 0.4833 - 2.575\sqrt{\frac{0.4833*0.5167}{120}} = 0.3658[/tex]

The upper limit of this interval is:

[tex]\pi + z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}} = 0.4833 + 2.575\sqrt{\frac{0.4833*0.5167}{120}} = 0.6001[/tex]

The 99% CI for the true proportion of voters who prefer the Republican candidate is (0.3658, 0.6001). This means that we are 99% sure that the true population proportion of all voters who prefer the Republican candidate is (0.3658, 0.6001).

b. If a candidate needs a simple majority of the votes to win the election, can the Republican candidate be confident of victory? Justify your response with an appropriate statistical argument.

The upper bound of the confidence interval is above 0.5 = 50%, which meas that the candidate can be confidence of victory.

Answer:

Part 1)

See Below.

Part 2)

[tex]\displaystyle (-0.179, -0.178) \cup (-0.010, 0.012)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1)

The linear approximation L for a function f at the point x = a is given by:

[tex]\displaystyle L \approx f'(a)(x-a) + f(a)[/tex]

We want to verify that the expression:

[tex]1-36x[/tex]

Is the linear approximation for the function:

[tex]\displaystyle f(x) = \frac{1}{(1+9x)^4}[/tex]

At x = 0.

So, find f'(x). We can use the chain rule:

[tex]\displaystyle f'(x) = -4(1+9x)^{-4-1}\cdot (9)[/tex]

Simplify. Hence:

[tex]\displaystyle f'(x) = -\frac{36}{(1+9x)^{5}}[/tex]

Then the slope of the linear approximation at x = 0 will be:

[tex]\displaystyle f'(1) = -\frac{36}{(1+9(0))^5} = -36[/tex]

And the value of the function at x = 0 is:

[tex]\displaystyle f(0) = \frac{1}{(1+9(0))^4} = 1[/tex]

Thus, the linear approximation will be:

[tex]\displaystyle L = (-36)(x-(0)) + 1 = 1 - 36x[/tex]

Hence verified.

Part B)

We want to determine the values of x for which the linear approximation L is accurate to within 0.1.

In other words:

[tex]\displaystyle \left| f(x) - L(x) \right | \leq 0.1[/tex]

By definition:

[tex]\displaystyle -0.1\leq f(x) - L(x) \leq 0.1[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]\displaystyle -0.1 \leq \left(\frac{1}{(1+9x)^4} \right) - (1-36x) \leq 0.1[/tex]

We can solve this by using a graphing calculator. Please refer to the graph shown below.

We can see that the inequality is true (i.e. the graph is between y = 0.1 and y = -0.1) for x values between -0.179 and -0.178 as well as -0.010 and 0.012.

In interval notation:

[tex]\displaystyle (-0.179, -0.178) \cup (-0.010, 0.012)[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]2^{3} * 3 * 5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Pick two points on the line

(0,-5)  and (1,-1)

We can find the slope using

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

   = ( -1 - -5)/(1 - 0)

  (-1+5)/(1-0)

    4/1

  = 4

Answer:

–81

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\angle C \cong \angle F[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]\angle A \cong \angle D[/tex]

[tex]AB \cong DE[/tex]

See attachment

Required

What proves [tex]\triangle ABC \cong \triangle DE F[/tex] by AAS

We have:

[tex]\angle A \cong \angle D[/tex] --- Angle

[tex]AB \cong DE[/tex] --- Side

We need to prove that one more angle are congruent

[tex]\angle B \cong \angle E[/tex]

The above angles are congruent; however, it will prove [tex]\triangle ABC \cong \triangle DE F[/tex] by ASA

So, we make use of:

[tex]\angle C \cong \angle F[/tex] because it completes the proof by AAS

Answer:

Since, mean of 200 items was 50 and number of items =200

So, mean =50

Also, we know mean = number of itemssum of items

∴50=200sum of items

Sum of items = 200×50=10000

Later on, it was discovered that the two items were misread as 92 and 8 instead of 192 and 88 respectively

Then  misread         instead         Correct item

             92                   192              192-92=100

              8                     88               88-8=80

∴ Correct sum of items =10000+180=10180

∴ Correct mean = number of items/sum of items

=10180/200 =50.9

Answer:

Hello,

203.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Sum of the item first= 50*200=10000

new sum is 10000+(192-92)+(88-8)=10180

New mean=10180/200=50.9

Why is this? It's because each time x goes up by 2, y is also increasing by 2. The rate of change is constant. I'm treating n as x, and C as y.

Another way to see why we have a linear function is to pick any two points from that table, and apply the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

You should find that no matter which two rows you pick, you should get a slope of 1.

Lastly, you can plot the three points from the table to find they all are on the same straight line as shown below. So there are at least 3 different ways to justify choice B as the answer.

Side note: The equation of the line is y = x-7, which then translates over to C = n-7.

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not sure about it

Try it find examples

Step-by-step explanation:

so at the end 2=1

not sure but hopefully you get the idea :)

Answer:

The answer is "28"

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex](LTPD) = 52\%\\\\(AQL) = 20\%\\\\\to \frac{LTPD}{AQL} = \frac{52\%}{20\%}= 2.6\\\\[/tex]

The value of [tex]\frac{LTPD}{AQL} = 2.6[/tex] that value of [tex]\frac{LTPD}{AQL} = 2.618[/tex]

Acceptance number, [tex]c = 9[/tex]

Value of [tex]n\times AQL = 5.426[/tex]

Sample size [tex]n = n\times \frac{AQL}{AQL} =\frac{5.426}{20\%} = 27.13=28[/tex]