please someone help me this is the third time i have had to post this question bc of bots

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{3x - 3}{x} \div \frac{x - 1}{x} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{3(x - 1)}{x} \times \frac{x}{x - 1} = 3[/tex]

Answer:

Rate = 10^(log[Ending Amount / Beginning Amount] ÷ time)  -1

Rate = 10^(log(1177 / 1100) ÷ time) -1

Rate = 10^(log( 1.07) ÷ 3) -1

Rate = 10^(0.029383777685 /3) -1

Rate = 10^(0.0097945926) -1

Rate = 1.0228091219 -1

Rate = .0228091219% / hour

Source http://www.1728.org/expgrwth.htm

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D. ( f + g)(x) = 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 5x - 3

Answer:

dont understand clearly

Step-by-step explanation:

dont understand clearly

Answer:

A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Start with

7y + 5 - 3

Combine like terms:

7y + 2

By combining like terms in 7y + 5 - 3, we end up with 7y + 2 which is the second expression.

Therefore, the expressions are equivalent because they evaluate to equal values for every value of y.

Answer: A.

Answer:

24/32

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{3}{4} = \frac{x}{32}[/tex]

To get from 4 to 32, you multiply by 8

so to get from 3 to x, multiply by 8

The answer for this would be 24/32

Answer:

II and II only.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first series converges because the common ratio r is 0.8 (<1).

II diverges as |r| > 1.

III is an alternating series with r = -4 - that is |r| = 4 so it diverges.

From the given-series, the series which diverges are : (ii) 4 + 8 + 16 + 32; and (iii) 2 - 8 + 32 - 128 + ..., So, correct option is (a) (ii) and (iii) only.

In option (ii), the series 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 is a geometric series with a common ratio of 2. We see that the "common-ratio" is greater than 1, this series diverges.

In option (iii), the series 2 - 8 + 32 - 128 is a geometric series with a common-ratio of |-4| = 4. We see that the "absolute-value" of the "common-ratio" is greater than 1, this series also diverges.

But, in option (i), the series -9.2 - 7.36 - 5.888 - 4.7104 is a geometric series with a common ratio of |-0.8| = 0.8. Since the "absolute-value" of the "common-ratio" is less than 1, this series converges.

Therefore, the correct answer is (a) (ii) and (iii) only.

Learn more about Series here

https://brainly.com/question/12725407

#SPJ6

Answer:40, 80 and 62

Step-by-step explanation:

182-22= 160

160/4 = 40 so,

Shortest side is 40

Longest is 80

Third side is 62

Answer:

The margin of error for a 90% confidence interval for the mean banking fee is of $0.44.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that to find our [tex]\alpha[/tex] level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.9}{2} = 0.05[/tex]

Now, we have to find z in the Z-table as such z has a p-value of [tex]1 - \alpha[/tex].

That is z with a pvalue of [tex]1 - 0.05 = 0.95[/tex], so Z = 1.645.

Now, find the margin of error M as such

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation of the population and n is the size of the sample.

Sample of 31:

This means that [tex]n = 31[/tex]

Assume the population standard deviation is $1.50.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 1.5[/tex]

Calculate the margin of error for a 90% confidence interval for the mean banking fee.

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]M = 1.645\frac{1.5}{\sqrt{31}}[/tex]

[tex]M = 0.44[/tex]

The margin of error for a 90% confidence interval for the mean banking fee is of $0.44.

Answer:

78%

Step-by-step explanation:

This question is pretty straight forward. Here we are to find the percentage probability of the of the defendants being convicted on any charge.

From the information available to us there's a 52% chance of being convicted of murder and also there's another 26% chance of conviction of something smaller. From this data available, the percentage chance that there will be a conviction is

52% + 26%

= 78%

Answer:

answer c

Step-by-step explanation:

(3x^3-2x^2+4x-5)+(6x-7)

3x^3-2x^2+10x-12

Answer:

а²-ab+8b+b²-1=a(a-b)+b(8+b)-1

Answer:

Resolver para  x

x=8869w/5 - 343

Step-by-step explanation:

simplificando ambos lados de la ecuación, entonces aislar la variable.  x

Answer: The answer is 125 degree(third option)

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 55 = 180 {being co interior angles}

or, x = 180 - 55

so, x = 125

Answer: The answer is D, 5/6.

Step-by-step explanation: The reciprocal of a fraction is that fraction but the numerator and denominater swapped places.

Answer:

5/6

Step-by-step explanation:

The reciprocal is where you flip the fraction

6/5 -> reciprocal -> 5/6

I'm not sure about your answer choices tho, sorry

Answer:

0.3902

Step-by-step explanation:

The question meets the criteria for the calculation of the confidence interval of a one sample proportion ;

Sample size, n = 27

Number of students with faster reaction time = 14

Phat = x / n = 14 / 27 = 0.6296

The confidence interval is calculated thus :

C. I = Phat ± Zcritical * √[p(1 - p)/n]

Zcritical at 99% = 2.576

C. I = 0.6296 ± 2.576 * √[0.6296(0.3704)/27]

C.I = 0.6296 ± 0.2394042

The lower boundary of C.I = 0.6296 - 0.2394042

Lower boundary = 0.3902

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It will be 31.4 cm rounded off for circumference

It will be 78.53 cm2 rounded off for area

Step-by-step explanation:

Diameter = 10 cm

Radius = 10/2 cm = 5 cm

Circumference = 2×pi×radius

= 2pi×5

= 31.4 cm

Area = pi × r square

= 25 pi

= 78.53cm2

Answer:

There was enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and in fact, the null hypothesis is false, which means that no error was committed.

Step-by-step explanation:

A company specializing in parachute assembly claims that its main parachute failure rate is at most 1%.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of at most 1%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p \leq 0.01[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of more than 1%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p > 0.01[/tex]

Type I and type II errors:

Type I: Rejection of a true null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is true, but from a sample, you get enough evidence to reject.

Type II: Non-rejection of a false null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is false, but from a sample, you do not get enough evidence to reject.

Your sample data resulted in enough evidence to go against the claim made by the company.

This means that there was enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

It was later determined that the claim made by the company was actually incorrect.

The null hypothesis was false.

What kind of error, if any, was committed?

There was enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and in fact, the null hypothesis is false, which means that no error was committed.

Answer:

In a pair of similar triangles, the corresponding sides are proportional.

Step-by-step explanation:

Corresponding sides touch the same two angle pairs. When the sides are corresponding it means to go from one triangle to another you can multiply each side by the same number.

Answer:

7/18

Step-by-step explanation:

1/6 x 3 = 3/18

3/18 + 4/18 = 7/18

Answer:

7/18

Step-by-step explanation:

Make the denominators the same!

You can turn 1/6 into 3/18 by multiplying the numerator and denominator by 3. Then you add the numerators of 3/18 and 4/18 together to get 7/18.

It can't be simplified any further :)

Answer:

Option C

We need to make the negative exponent positive.

The rule is: [tex]A^{-B} =\frac{1}{A^{B} }[/tex]

Here, A=x, B= 12

[tex]so,[/tex] [tex]x^{-12}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{x^{12} }[/tex]

OAmalOHopeO

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The two given points can be used to find the slope:

  m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)

  m = (650 -400)/(4 -2) = 250/2 = 125

The vertical axis is cost, and the horizontal axis is years, so the slope is the ratio of these: cost per year.

The slope of $125 per year is the yearly membership dues cost.

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

a/b=3------equation 1

a+b=2-----equation 2

from equation 2

b=2-a

substitute b=2-a in equation 1

a/2-a=3

a=3(2-a)

a=6-3a

a+3a=6

a=6/4

a=3/2

substitute a=3/2 in equation 2

3/2+b=2

3+2b=4

2b=1

b=1/2

a-b=3/2-1/2

a-b=(3-1)/2

a-b=2/2

a-b=1

Answer:

3

256

sq.units

Step-by-step explanation:

Both parabolas cut each other at (0,0) and (16,16)

Area enclosed by these parabolas

=∫

0

16

4

x

dx−∫

0

16

16

x

2

dx

=[

3

2×4×x

3/2

]

0

16

−[

16×3

x

3

]

0

16

=

3

2×4

4

−

3

4

4

=

3

256

sq. units